THIRD
YEAR LABORATORY
SCIENTIFIC
REPORT WRITING
GUIDELINES
GENERAL POINTS
Report
writing is an indispensable part of scientific work since
it allows others, e.g. your peers, supervisors or future
generations of scientists, to understand and assess your
achievements. It is an exercise in scientific communication
and hence proceeds according to certain rules, some of which
are given below.
Reports
at third year level should be written in the format
accepted by scientific and technical journals e.g.
'The Physical Review'. Two examples of scientific papers
are presented in the display case, just inside the entrance
to Room 101, and you are urged to consult these.
Your
report should be aimed at the level of an average
third year physics student so that, after reading
the report, they would be able to understand what you did,
the physics that's involved and how good your results are.
The report should be well organised and
thoughtfully written with clear diagrams and graphs.
You should be as concise as possible; do not give unnecessary
details (e.g. tables of results, calculations) or long winded
descriptions or waste time and space copying out experimental
notes etc. Concentrate on essentials, show that you understand
what you are doing and can pick out the significant
features. Spend your time on thinking and
planning, do not spend hours typing and
word processing - beautiful presentation will not make up
for obvious weaknesses in understanding and lack of content!
The
report should be typed using a word processor
and be submitted in a separate folder with
your name and the title of the experiment on the front cover.
ORGANISATION
The
material should be organised into sections (not all sections
will be applicable to every report) such as the following:
This
is a very concise (< 150 words) statement of the experiment
and your most significant conclusions. Be sure to include
your final results and associated errors.
By
reading the abstract, another person should be able to determine
whether the contents of the report are of any interest or
use to them.
This
section should give an overview of the experiment and the
physics involved in it. Relate the experiment to the wider
context of other work on similar topics and explain what
knowledge can be gained from doing the particular experiment.
Here
you should present the theoretical relationships necessary
to understand and analyse the experimental results, together
with a discussion, in your own words, of what they mean.
Say where the relationships come from (cite references?)
and what special conditions/ assumptions
they work under, but don't present lengthy derivations
(these may go in an Appendix if necessary). Be sure to explain
the meaning of all symbols used in quoted formulae.
Describe
the equipment, its function and the experimental measurement
techniques you used. Make use of your own block
diagrams and neat line drawings, with the various
components clearly identified, to illustrate your descriptions.
Each diagram should be given a title and a figure number
which is then referred to in the text of the report.
Do
not inundate the reader with details of each experimental
step or reproduce the experimental notes. Be sure, however,
to describe any methods you used which differ from
the standard procedure.
This
section forms the core of your report.
You
should clearly state the procedures used
to analyse the raw data, but the arithmetical details of
the analysis should not be included. Compare
your results with the predictions of the relevant
theoretical models and, where possible, with those
of other workers. Try to explain any discrepancies
between your results and what is expected. Discuss the sources
of error in your experiment and any other shortcomings
in the apparatus or techniques.
When
estimating the error in a final result, only the method
of error calculation should be explained, details
of the error calculation may be given in an appendix.
Results and theoretical predictions should, wherever possible,
be presented in graphical form (a table of results is then
unnecessary). Graphs should have their
axes clearly labelled with units and dimensions
correctly shown and with errors represented
by error bars (or rectangles). Each graph
should have a title and a figure number,
for reference within the text. If a comparison of non-graphical
results is necessary, the results should be presented in
tabular form.
Here
you summarise the physical insights gained from the experiment.
State clearly your final results, their
reliability and any scientific conclusions
you can draw from the results. Try to suggest ways to minimise
the dominant errors, improve the apparatus, methods etc.
Give
a list of the references you have used, in the standard
format accepted by scientific journals
(see sample papers).
Here
you may include derivations of formulae, extra results,
sample calculations of results, errors etc., if you feel
these are necessary to make a point.
Scientific
Report
Assessment Sheet |
| Section |
Very
good |
Good
|
Satis-
factory |
Poor
|
Comments |
| Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Theory
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental
procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
| Diagrams
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Graphs
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Results |
|
|
|
|
|
| Error
estimate |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
and/or
conclusion |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other |
|
|
|
|
|
General
remarks:
| Student's
name: |
Mark
awarded: /10 |
|
| Marker's
name: |
Signature: |
Date:
|

|
Further Information |
Contact:
|