Settled once and for all the question of the nature/origin of the force responsible for motions of the heavenly bodies. this was done by invoking a PHYSICAL LAW - something that applies to all bodies, ie. UNIVERSAL.
It was the same force that caused the apple to drop from a tree as which caused the moon to orbit the earth. The force was universal and it was due to the mutual attraction between masses: GRAVITATION.
This force could be expressed mathematically:
Newton's Cosmology: he argued that his law required the Universe to be infinite in extent, for if the universe was finite, all bodies in it would be pulled together into one body (by gravity), whereas many bodies (stars) were seen. In an infinite universe, matter would be pulled into an infinite number of small condensations.
Newton worried a lot about mutual forces between planets, which he thought
must eventually lead to the disintegration of the solar system. To avoid
this awful event, Newton envisioned the ``hand of God'' occasionally
intervening to reset the clockwork mechanisms of planetary motions.
``The Universe was a mechnical one whose order was maintained by a distant
God''.
| Aspect of Model | Ptolemy | Copernicus | Kepler | Newton |
| Planetary motions | uniform, | uniform, | non-uniform, | non-uniform, |
| circular | circular | elliptical | elliptical | |
| Force on planets? | None, | None, | Yes, | Yes, |
| natural | natural | magnetic | gravity | |
| Kind of cosmos | geocentric, | heliocentric, | heliocentric, | centerless |
| finite | finite | finite | infinite |
At the beginning of the 20th century, astronomers were aware of: planets, other stars, and fuzzy cloud-like patches of light called `nebulae'. Many of the nebulae had beautiful spiral shapes.
Despite Newton's concept of an infinite Universe, there was still a strong school of thought that our galaxy, the Milky Way, was all there was in the Universe.
The ``Shapley-Curtis'' debate:
Curtis based his argument on the PRINCIPLE OF UNIFORMITY OF NATURE: all objects have similar properties until proven otherwise. Assuming this to be the case for the spiral nebulae, he showed that their range in angular size (apparent diameter on the sky) was so large that the smallest objects had to be at distances beyond our galaxy.
Resolution of the Shapley-Curtis debate: came in 1924 when EDWIN HUBBLE measured the distance to `Andromeda' - a spectacular spiral nebula in the northern sky - using variable stars within it. He derived a distance of 900,000 light years (=distance light travels in a year = 9,500,000,000,000kms), far beyond the most distant stars known in our galaxy.
Slipher: collected spectra of numerous spiral nebulae in the decade
prior to 1924
appeared to all be RECEEDING from us.
When Hubble combined distance measurements he made to a number of spiral
galaxies with Slipher's velocities, he found a correlation between the
two: THE FURTHER AWAY A GALAXY WAS, THE FASTER IT WAS MOVING FROM US!
This became known as Hubble's Law:
``Starlight is falling on every square mile of the earth's surface and the best we can do is gather up and concentrate the rays that strike an area 100inches in diameter'' (George Ellery Hale, 1928)
Lens-based (refractor) telescopes - limit to how big lenses could be made - heavy, difficult to support, optical distortions.
Mirror-based (reflector) telescopes - first used shiny metal surfaces as mirrors (speculum) - quickly oxidised (1800's). In the early 1900's, silver-on-glass mirrors were perfected and subsequently became the preferred technology for building larger & larger telescopes.
| Date | 1908 | 1917 | 1948 | 1993 |
| Mirror size | 60 | 100 | 200 | 400 |
| (diameter in inches) |
These are the devices which capture and record astronomical light signals.
Early 1900's - photography developed and started to be used in astronomy, replacing the eyeball as a light detector. This had several advantages:
1970's - electronic detectors begin to be used more and more in astronomy (silicon, TV, military technologies).
(a)Launch telescopes into space
(b)Send probes to other planets