(a)Pythagoras (
BC) - put forward the idea that the
earth was round, but not on the basis of observation; rather he, like many
ancient philosophers, believed that a sphere was the perfect shape and
the gods would have therefore created the Earth in this form.
[Spheres: a common feature of subsequent models and a common shape in nature]
(b)Aristotle (350BC) - Earth was spherical on the basis of the curved shape of the Earth's shadow projected on the Moon during a lunar eclipse. He also noticed that as he travelled south, he saw stars that were previously hidden below the southern horizon.
(c)Eratosthenes (230BC) - head of the library at Alexandria
in Egypt, he was the first to measure the Earth's size, obtaining a value of
miles for its diameter, close to the presently known value!
How did he do it? He utilised the Sun when at summer solstice, ie. at
its highest point in the noon-day sky:
Having measured the angle of sun to the vertical at Alexandria to be
,
and knowing the distance from Alexandria to Syene (=5000stadia;
1stadia = 0.1mile), circumference of earth
stadia =25,700miles.
(d)Aristarchus - estimated the relative size of the earth, moon & sun and the relative distances to the moon & sun.
Earth/Moon size: compared size of earth's shadow on the moon during a
lunar eclipse to the size of the moon's disk
Sun/Moon/Earth distance: calculated sun to be
times farther
away than moon by measuring sun/moon angle
at first quarter
From knowing ES/EM
20 and d
dearth, Aristarchus
deduced that d
dearth. Although ES/EM
20 and
dsun/dearth were underestimates, Aristarchus was the first to
establish:
ARISTARCHUS WAY AHEAD OF HIS TIME (BY 2000 YEARS)!!
But, there was a good reason not to believe Aristarchus' model: if earth was moving around the sun then the positions of stars should change throughout the year - an effect called PARALLAX. But no change in separation of stars was observed.
[Later it was realised that the stars' distances had been underestimated and so this parallax effect was a lot smaller than thought and too small to measure (with the naked eye at least)]
The problem of explaining the retrograde motion of the planets dominated cosmology for more than 2000yrs. The Greeks formulated a basic geocentric model in which the earth was at the centre of a whole series of rotating spheres.
The moon, planets, Sun, stars all moved on separate spheres whose radius was inversely proportional to the speed at which they travelled across the sky. Order of the spheres: Moon (innermost), Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter....(spheres slightly tilted with respect to each other to reproduce the observed motions).
This could still not explain the retrograde motions! - the contrived situation of spheres at times stopping, reversing direction, and then resuming original motion was considered too clumsy and unappealing even to the Greeks.
PTOLEMY (
AD125) - came up with an explanation for planetary
motion via epicyclic (`wheels on wheels') behaviour: planets moved in
a small circle as well as a larger one.
While more successful than any previous model, discrepancies remained between predicted & observed positions of planets. Epicyclic models with greater complexity were devised but mistrusted due to being far too contrived and overly complex.
After
AD, Greek civilization declined and astronomy/cosmology
languished. It was not until the 12th century when Arabic manuscripts of
Greek thought were translated into Latin, that the knowledge and
interpretation accumulated by the Greeks, became widely known.