|
1
|
- V.V. Flambaum
- School of Physics, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
- Co-authors:
- Atomic calculations
V.Dzuba,M.Kozlov,E.Angstmann,J.Berengut,M.Marchenko,Cheng
Chin,S.Karshenboim,A.Nevsky
- Nuclear and QCD calculations
E.Shuryak,V.Dmitriev,D.Leinweber,A.Thomas,R.Young,A.Hoell,
- P.Jaikumar,C.Roberts,S.Wright,A.Tedesco,W.Wiringa
- Cosmology J.Barrow
- Quasar data analysis
J.Webb,M.Murphy,M.Drinkwater,W.Walsh,P.Tsanavaris,S.Curran
- Quasar observations C.Churchill,J.Prochazka,A.Wolfe, thanks to
W.Sargent,R.Simcoe
|
|
2
|
- Extra space dimensions (Kaluza-Klein, Superstring and M-theories). Extra
space dimensions is a common feature of theories unifying gravity with
other interactions. Any change in size of these dimensions would
manifest itself in the 3D world as variation of fundamental constants.
- Scalar fields . Fundamental constants
depend on scalar fields which vary in space and time (variable
vacuum dielectric constant e0
). May be related to “dark energy” and accelerated expansion of
the Universe..
- “ Fine tuning” of fundamental constants is needed for humans to exist. Example: low-energy
resonance in production of carbon from helium in stars (He+He+He=C).
Slightly different coupling constants — no resonance –- no life.
- Variation of coupling
constants in space provide natural explanation of the “fine tuning”: we
appeared in area of the Universe where values of fundamental constants
are suitable for our existence.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Since variation of dimensional constants
cannot be distinguished from variation of units, it only makes sense to
consider variation of dimensionless constants.
- Fine structure constant a=e2/hc=1/137.036
- Electron or quark mass/QCD strong interaction scale, me,q/LQCD
- a strong (r)=const/ln(r LQCD
/ch)
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Use atomic calculations to find w(a).
- For a close to a0 w
= w0 + q(a2/a02-1)
- q is found by varying a in computer codes:
- q = dw/dx = [w(0.1)-w(-0.1)]/0.2,
x=a2/a02-1
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Values of q=dE/da2
are sensitive to the
position of level crossing
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Murphy et al, 2003: Keck telescope, 143 systems, 23 lines, 0.2<z<4.2
- Da/a=-0.543(116) x 10-5
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- 10 5 Da/a
- Murphy et al
- North hemisphere
-0.66(12)
- South (close to North)
-0.36(19)
- Strianand et al (South) -0.06(06)
|
|
20
|
- Grand unification models (Marciano; Calmet,
- Fritzch;Langecker,Segre Strasser;Dent)
- D(m/LQCD)/(m/LQCD)=35Da/a
- Proton mass Mp=3LQCD , measure me/Mp
- Nuclear magnetic moments m=g eh/4Mpc
- g=g(mq/
LQCD)
- 3. Nuclear energy levels
|
|
21
|
- Dimensionless parameter is mq/LQCD . It is
convenient to assume LQCD =const, i.e. measure mq in
units of LQCD
- mp is proportional to
(mqLQCD)1/2
Dmp/mp=0.5Dmq/mq
- Other meson and nucleon masses remains finite for mq=0. Dm/m=K Dmq/mq
- Coefficients K are calculated for p,n,r,w,s.
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Tsanavaris,Webb,Murphy,Flambaum,
- Curran PRL 2005
- Hyperfine H/optical , 8 quasar absorption systems with
Mg,Ca,Mn,C,Si,Zn,Cr,Fe,Ni
- Measured X=a2 gp me / Mp
- DX/X=1.17(1.01)10-5 No
variation
- Reinhold,Bunnin,Hollenstein,Ivanchik,
- Petitjean PRL 2006 , H2 molecule,
2 systems
- D(me / Mp )/ (me / Mp)=-2.4(0.6)10-5 Variation 4 s !
- Systematics or space-time variation?
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- n+Sm capture cross section is dominated by
- Er =0.1 eV resonance
- Shlyakhter;Damour,Dyson;Fujii et al
- Limits on variation of alpha
- Flambaum, Shuryak PRD 2003
- DEr = 170 MeV DX/X + 1
MeV Da/a
- X=ms/ LQCD ,
enhancement 170 MeV/0.1 eV=1.7x109
- Lamoreax,Torgerson PRD(2004) DEr =-0.58(5) eV
- DX/X=-0.34(3) 10-9 two
billion years ago
|
|
30
|
- Cesium primary frequency standard:
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Comparing rates of different
clocks over long period of time can be used to study time variation of
fundamental constants!
|
|
33
|
- Very narrow lines, high accuracy of measurements.
- Flexibility to choose lines with larger sensitivity to variation of
fundamental constants.
- Simple interpretation (local time variation).
|
|
34
|
- Microwave transitions: hyperfine
frequency is sensitive to nuclear magnetic moments (suggested by
Karshenboim)
- We performed atomic, nuclear and QCD calculations of powers k ,b for
H,D,Rb,Cd+,Cs,Yb+,Hg+
- V=C(Ry)(me/Mp)a2+k (mq/LQCD)b
, Dw/w=DV/V
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Dy: 4f105d6s E=19797.96… cm-1 , q=
6000 cm-1
- 4f95d26s E=19797.96… cm-1 , q= -23000 cm-1
- Interval Dw = 10-4 cm-1
- Enhancement factor K = 108
(!), i.e. Dw/w0 = 108
Da/a
|
|
37
|
- Cancellations between rotational and hyperfine intervals in very narrow
microwave transitions in
- LaS, LaO, LuS,LuO, etc.
- w0 =Erotational -E
hyperfine= E hyperfine /100-1000
- Enhancement factor K = 102 -103,
- Dw/w0 = K Da/a
|
|
38
|
- Very narrow UV transition between first excited and ground state in 229 Th nucleus
- Energy 3-5 eV, width 10-4
Hz
- Nuclear/QCD calculation: Enhancement 105 -106,
- Dw/w0 = 105 (4 Da/a + DXq/Xq-10DXs/Xs
)
- Xq=mq/ LQCD , Xs=ms/ LQCD
- 235 U energy 76 eV,
width 6 10-4 Hz
|
|
39
|
- Enhancement near Feshbach resonance.
- Variation of scattering length
- a/a=K D X/X , K=102 – 1012
- X=me/Mp
|
|
40
|
- Quasar data: MM method provided sensitivity increase 100 times. Anchors,
positive and negative shifters-control of systematics. Keck- variation
of a, VLT-no variation.
Undiscovered systematics or spatial variation.
- me /Mp :
hyperfine H/optical – no variation, H2 - variation 4 s . Undiscovered
systematics or space-time variation.
- Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: may be interpreted as variation of ms/
LQCD ?
- Oklo: variation of ms/ LQCD ?
- Atomic clocks: present time
variation of a , ms/ LQCD
- Transitions between narrow close levels in atoms, molecules and nuclei –
huge enhancement!
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, J, K. Webb, PRL 82, 888 (1999).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, J, K. Webb, PRA 59, 230 (1999).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, PRA 61,
034502 (2000).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, M. T. Murphy, J, K. Webb, LNP 570, 564
(2001).
- J. K. Webb et al , PRL 87, 091301 (2001).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, M. T. Murphy, J, K. Webb, PRA 63, 042509
(2001).
- M. M. Murphy et al, MNRAS, 327, 1208 (2001).
- V. A. Dzuba et al, PRA, 66, 022501 (2002).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, M. V. Marchenko, PRA 68, 022506 (2003).
- E. J. Angstmann, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, PRA 70, 014102 (2004).
- J. C. Berengat et al, PRA 70, 064101 (2004).
- M. M. Murphy et al, LNP, 648, 131 (2004).
- V. A. Dzuba, PRA, 71, 032512 (2005).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, PRA, 71, 052509 (2005).
- V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, PRA, 72, 052514 (2005).
- V. A. Dzuba, PRA, 71, 062501 (2005).
- S. G. Karshenboim et al, physics/0511180.
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
- Fine structure interval
- DFS = E(p3/2) - E(p1/2) = A(Za)2
- If DZ is observed at red shift Z and D0 is FS
measured on Earth then
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
87
|
- Not every fine structure interval can be used in the analysis based on
formula DE=A(Za)2 (not
good!).
- Strong enhancement is possible (good, but for atomic clocks only).
- Level crossing may lead to instability of calculations (bad!).
|
|
88
|
|
|
89
|
- Two 3D3/2 states are strongly mixed, but g-factors
do not depend on mixing.
|
|
90
|
|