How do we
compare to other life forms in the Universe?

|
Media Release - School
of Physics - The University of New South Wales
Tuesday January 16th 2001 |
Media Release
So far, searches for ET have come
up empty-handed. No signals have been detected. But UNSW astronomer
Dr Charles Lineweaver has come up with a new way to tell us something
about extraterrestrials. By cleverly combining observations of extrasolar
planets and the rate of star formation in the Universe, he finds
that compared to other Earth-like planets in the Universe, our Earth
is extremely young.
In a paper recently submitted to the
journal "Icarus" Dr Lineweaver reports that "three
quarters of the Earth-like planets in the Universe are older than
the Earth and their average age is 1.8 (plus or minus 0.9) billion
years older than the Earth."
One part of Dr Lineweaver's argument
runs as follows: Immediately after the big bang, 13 billion years
ago, the Universe was made of hydrogen and helium. There was no
carbon, oxygen, iron, silicon; therefore no Earth-like planets could
form around the first stars. However, in a strong burst of star
formation which lasted a few billion years, these ingredients were
produced in abundance by stars, and thereafter, the formation of
Earth-like planets became possible. But there is a catch. Too many
of these ingredients seems to be a bad thing for Earth formation.
The 50 or so huge extrasolar planets detected so far are found preferentially
around stars rich in these ingredients. And these huge planets are
in orbits that would destroy any Earth-like planets. Dr Lineweaver
calls this a Goldilocks effect: "with too few ingredients earths
are unable to form, with too many, giant planets destroy any earths
trying to form".
Although the analysis is about terrestrial
planets, not the life on them, Dr Lineweaver concludes that "If
life forms readily on Earth-like planets -- as suggested by the
rapid appearance of life on Earth -- this analysis gives us an age
distribution for life on such planets and a rare clue about how
we compare to other life which may inhabit the Universe. "The
"rare clue" is this: most of the life forms in the Universe
have had two billion years longer to evolve than we have. To put
this time span in perspective, two billion years ago our ancestors
were amoebas.
Dr Lineweaver's article "An Estimate
of the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets in the Universe:
Quantifying Metallicity as a Selection Effect" is available
online at http://xxx.adelaide.edu.au/abs/astro-ph/0012399.
The January 13th issue of New Scientist describes this research
in an article by Marcus Chown.

|
Further Information
|
Contact:
|