|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Challenges and constraints
- Large classes 50-450; fewer staff
- Teaching vs. research
- Varied high school science education
- Funding for staff/teaching developments Waning interest in enabling
sciences
- “The new realities of the student experience largely concern the change
in priority students now give to their time at university…[they] appear
to be less engaged with university life generally and with study in
particular… [they have many more choices about when, where and what they
will study, and how much commitment they need to make to university
life.”
- (Craig McInnis, 2003)
|
|
3
|
- Even ‘old’ physics is complex:
- The speed of light is a constant
in vacuum
- The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames
(Einstein,1905)
- “Any particular thought in our [Lecturer] head embraces a vast amount of
information. But when it comes to communicating a thought to someone
else [the poor student], attention spans are short and mouths are slow.
To get information into a listener’s head in a reasonable amount of
time, a speaker can encode only a fraction of the message into words and
must count on the listener to fill in the rest [whether deliberately,
through a predilection for egocentric communication or simply too busy
and tired to care]”
- (Stephen Pinker, 1994)
|
|
4
|
- Communicating (difficult) concepts
- Students learning a new mathematical language
- Graduate skills (attributes) to be addressed
- Problem solving skills
- The product of a university education?
- How are our graduates ‘superior’ to
- contemporaries who didn’t go to university?
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- MIT and UC Davis have custom designed their labs to enable a certain
flexible teaching style to be implemented that combines elements of
lectures, tuts and traditional labs in a collaborative setting.
- Compare with Berkeley who are planning folding walls, movable tables etc
but have made no firm commitment to any direction in pedagogy.
- Which model is preferable?
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- A physics student’s perspective
|
|
24
|
- Dry
- Difficult
- Irrelevant
- Elitist
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Attention span
- Different priority heirarchy
- Everyone learns different, like
- The Customer is always right
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Reinforcement (positive)
- Learn concepts from multiple perspectives
- Practical introduction to difficult concepts and problem-solving
- Fun?
|
|
29
|
- Reinforcement (positive)
- Learn concepts from multiple perspectives
- Practical introduction to difficult concepts and problem-solving
- Fun?
|
|
30
|
- Simple
- Demonstrative
- Quantitative
- Fun
- Compact
- Inexpensive
|
|
31
|
- Design
- Prototyping
- Feasibility/Scalability
- Mass Production
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Pilot studies
- The ‘Real Thing’
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Relate to practical examples
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Relate to
- practical examples
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Multimedia enhancements
- Video illustration of physical processes
- Animations to clarify unseen processes
- Applets for pre and post work activities
- Monitoring and evaluation as development processes
|
|
47
|
- Observation and feedback to build on most effective exploratorial
activities
- Focus groups
- Surveys
- Comparative performance data with previous years
|
|
48
|
- Fully integrate lecture, tutorial, laboratory processes into an
engaging, high performance learning system
- Share ideas and experiences with staff involved with other courses
|
|
49
|
|