|
In times of
conflict, the deployment of magnetic mines around ports and major
shipping lanes can cause great damage to naval and merchant vessels
and paralyse essential trade. In order for a ship to pass safely
it is necessary to camouflage the vessel from magnetic detection.
That is, it must be magnetically silent. This is especially
important with detail such as mine-sweeping and marine mine evasion
but also generally useful in avoiding magnetic anomaly detectors
(MADs).
Naval submarines
and surface ships are regularly subjected to a treatment called
deperming that seeks to design the vessels permanent
magnetisation for optimal magnetic camouflage. However, the incumbent
deperm procedure is governed by empirical rules, it is time consuming
and there is no existing model for predicting the magnetisation
of a vessel during or after deperming. In fact, it has been shown
in this project that, because of the empirical rules employed, no
theoretical estimate of a deperm outcome can be made a priori.
To address these
issues we have established a laboratory scale magnetic treatment
facility as a successful simulator of the deperm process on large
naval vessels (see Figure 1). Using this facility we developed alternative
deperm protocols based on the physics of anhysteretic magnetisation
and a mathematical model of magnetic hysteresis applicable to naval
vessels.
 |
| Figure
1. Oberon Class submarine in the MTF at HMAS Stirling in
Western Australia. The laboratory apparatus was approximately
1/100th scale. |
The alternative
anhysteretic deperm was found to produce a more reliable
deperm result than the current method: a feature which has the potential
to reduce the time requirement for a deperm by 50%. The anhysteretic
deperm also had the advantage of being grounded entirely in physical
principles. A variation of the Preisach model for hysteresis was
used to compute magnetisation changes both for the laboratory model
and for a submarine; the agreement with measured data in both cases
was excellent (see Figure 2). These results possess the additional
synergy that magnetisation during and after an anhysteretic deperm
can be easily calculated using the derived model.
 |
| Figure
2. Reduced results for longitudinal magnetisation (M) in
an Oberon class submarine during a standard deperm and the theoretical
predictions from the Preisach model. The values for M follow
the sequence of alternating applied fields. |
Tim
Baynes, Graeme Russell and A. Bailey
|