THIRD YEAR LABORATORY

SCIENTIFIC POSTER PREPARATION

GUIDELINES

GENERAL POINTS

A scientific poster is a communication tool which combines a fixed visual display with a verbal discussion of scientific information. Most scientific meetings include poster sessions in their program; during these sessions each presenter stands next to their poster, to discuss the presented work on a one-to-one basis and to answer any questions. Posters enable a group of scientists to present their findings concurrently, while allowing the audience to view many presentations and to quickly obtain essential information on topics of interest to them.

Posters differ from other forms of scientific communication (e.g. written reports or orally presented papers) in that there is often a 'competitive market' for the attention of the reader. They are not just reports laid out on a large sheet of cardboard - you need to use your imagination to exploit the full 2D presentation capabilities of the medium in order to entice the viewer to view more of your work and to further discuss it with you. Posters normally contain very little textual detail, the text mainly serving to support the graphic material.

Your poster should be aimed at the level of an average third year physics student so that, after viewing it and talking to you, they should be able to understand what you did, the physics that's involved and the significance of your results.

You should be as concise as possible, do not give unnecessary details or long winded descriptions. Concentrate on essentials, show that you understand what you did and can pick out the significant features. Spend your time on thinking and planning, rather than on fancy features and artistry - 'beautiful' presentation will not make up for obvious lack of content or weakness in understanding.

Information on poster design, with various references and relevant sites, can be found at:
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/asl/guides/bio/posters.html
while good, short advice on poster presentations is at:
http://lorien.ncl.ac.uk/ming/Dept/Tips/present/posters.htm
and a full tutorial on designing posters can be found at:
http://www.kumc.edu/SAH/OTEd/jradel/Poster_Presentations/PstrStart.html

ORGANISATION

Your poster should be A1 size (594mm x 841mm) i.e. equivalent to two columns, each of four A4 (landscape) sheets. It should consist of approx 20% text, 40% graphics and 40% empty space (do not cram the poster full with information!). The poster can be printed on one sheet (if you have access to a large format printer) or be made from separate smaller sheets pasted onto a (coloured?) backing board. Posters should be laminated (e.g. at the 'Union Shop' - Blockhouse). The laboratory will pay printing and laminating costs (up to a total of $25) on production of receipts. All submitted posters become the property of the Third Year Laboratory.

The poster material should be organised in sections (see below) presented in a logical sequence which is easy for the viewer to follow (e.g. top?bottom, left?right, with the abstract/overview at the top and conclusions at the bottom).

Try to keep text to a minimum; use short sentences (or sentence fragments) and paragraphs to convey your message. The text font size should be legible from at least 1.5m (18 pt), with larger (at least 32pt) section headings; bold text is easier to read from a distance. Don't use too many different fonts as this can distract the viewer's attention, as can too many bright clashing colours.

Graphics (photos?), large enough to be clearly discernible from 1.5m, should be used wherever possible. Label graphs directly (no legends, keys) and use colour, rather than patterns, to distinguish different data sets and areas of interest. Avoid combining red and green for those viewers who may be red/green colour blind. Make sure you use an adequate font size for graphics labels to be legible from 1.5m.

The following sections will normally appear (in various guises) in a scientific poster:

  • Title
    The title is the '5 second grab' -sometimes you may increase interest by a good choice of title. State the topic of your work (less than 12 words) in an interesting (preferably catchy) manner. Avoid abbreviations and jargon. The title should be positioned across the top of the poster and be easily readable from at least 3m.
  • Name(s) of author(s)
    Will appear directly below the title, in a somewhat smaller font.
  • Abstract or Overview 1-2 paragraphs
    Here you might try to capture the reader=s interest with a puzzle, a paradox or new and interesting information. Give a very selective overview of the topic, relating your topic to the wider context of other work; define any special terms or jargon.
    The remaining sections, forming the body of the poster, can be divided into >boxes= whose layout (or other clues) should lead the viewer through the poster in a logical sequence.
  • Method of attack (method/apparatus) 1-2 paragraphs
    Very briefly describe the procedures and equipment you used. Where possible, make use of block diagrams and neat line drawings to illustrate experimental design, with various components clearly identified.
  • Results / analysis - largest section
    A brief qualitative description of the results is helpful here. Include the theoretical relationships necessary to understand and analyse the results. Your experimental data and theoretical predictions should, wherever possible, be presented in graphical form. The graphics should be independent of the text to the extent that just a brief glance at them alone, without reading the supporting text, is sufficient to convey to the viewer the essence of what you've achieved. To this end, graphs should always have their axes clearly labelled with units and dimensions correctly shown and with errors represented by error bars (or rectangles). If a comparison of non-graphical results proves necessary, the results should be presented in a table.

  • Discussion / conclusion 1-2 paragraphs
    Compare your results with the predictions of relevant theoretical models or with other accepted measurements. Try to explain any discrepancies between your results and what is expected. Discuss the sources of error in your experiment and any other shortcomings in the apparatus or techniques. Try to propose possible future experimental improvements and suggest ways to minimise the dominant errors, upgrade the apparatus, methods etc. Summarise the physical insights gained from the experiment. State clearly your findings, their reliability and any scientific implications you can draw from the results.
    At conferences, some authors make a one-page handout that presents their poster plus some further information or data. Sometimes printed copies of a report are pinned under the poster for the viewer to take, if sufficiently interested in the poster.

 

Scientific Poster
Assessment Sheet
  Very
good
Good Satis-
factory
Poor Comments
Presentation
Visual appeal          
Logical layout (sequencing)          
Effective use of graphics/ tables          
Economy/ clarity of expression          
Verbal discussion with author(s)          
Content
Description of problem
(introduction)
         
Method of attack
(apparatus/ method)
         
Results and analysis (data/ theory)          
Discussion/ conclusion          
Other          

General remarks:

 

Poster author: Mark awarded: /10  

 

Marker's name: Signature: Date:


 


 

Information

Further Information

Contact:

[ Search | School Information | Physics Courses | Research | Graduate ]
[
Resources | Physics ! | Physics Main Page | UNSW Main Page ]

School of Physics - The University of New South Wales - Sydney Australia 2052
Site Comments: physicsweb@phys.unsw.edu.au
© School of Physics - UNSW 2000